Visual Function Benefit After Treatment With Pegcetacoplan: Microperimetry Analysis From The Phase 3 Oaks Trial: Microperimetry: Visual Function Benefit With Pegcetacoplan.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: A Yasin Alibhai, Caroline R Baumal, Caleb Bliss, Usha Chakravarthy, Robyn H Guymer, Frank G Holz, Philip Lewis, Marco U Morales, Eric M Moult, Aleksandra V Rachitskaya, Roy Schwartz, Hanne Vorwerk, Stela Vujosevic, Nadia K Waheed

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại: 331.7 Labor by industry and occupation

Thông tin xuất bản: United States : American journal of ophthalmology , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 122773

 PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of pegcetacoplan on its ability to slow the loss of visual function using microperimetry endpoints in eyes with geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trial data. METHODS: Utilizing data from the OAKS study, which evaluated pegcetacoplan monthly (PM) or every other month (PEOM) versus sham for the treatment of GA secondary to AMD, microperimetry endpoints were assessed at baseline and every 6 months until 24 months, using a 10-2 grid composed of 68 points with a 4-2 threshold strategy. Main outcome measures included the time to development of absolute scotomas in the 4 and 16 central macular points. The number of absolute scotomatous points and mean retinal sensitivity (dB) within the junctional zone extending to 250 µm on either side of autofluorescence-determined GA border was analyzed for change from baseline. RESULTS: Among 605 patients with subfoveal or nonsubfoveal GA, treatment with pegcetacoplan delayed time to development of absolute scotomas of all 4 central macular points compared to sham at 24 months (PM: hazard ratio [HR]: 0.66 [34% risk reduction]
  95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46, 0.96
  p = 0.0282
  PEOM: HR: 0.64 [36% risk reduction]
  95% CI: 0.44, 0.92
  p = 0.0164). Similarly, PM and PEOM treatment delayed time to development of absolute scotomas of all 16 central points (PM: HR: 0.57 [43% risk reduction]
  95% CI: 0.33, 0.96
  p = 0.0361
  PEOM: HR: 0.52 [48% risk reduction]
  95% CI: 0.32, 0.85
  p = 0.0084). Across the junctional zone of GA, pegcetacoplan-treated eyes developed fewer absolute scotomatous points (PM difference vs sham pooled: -0.68 points, p = 0.1444
  PEOM difference vs sham pooled: -1.14 points, p = 0.0140) and experienced decreased loss of mean retinal sensitivity (PM difference vs sham pooled: 0.56 dB, p = 0.0650
  PEOM difference vs sham pooled: 0.71 dB, p = 0.0202) compared with sham at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Microperimetry demonstrates a reduced rate of visual function loss in the central macula and junctional zone with pegcetacoplan treatment in GA due to AMD.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH