Implementation of Brief Submaximal Cardiopulmonary Testing in a High-Volume Presurgical Evaluation Clinic: Feasibility Cohort Study.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Daniel Agarkov, Andres Brenes-Bastos, Zyad James Carr, Jean Charchaflieh, Jonah Freund, Paul Heerdt, Judy Li, Robert B Schonberger, Jill Zafar

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại:

Thông tin xuất bản: Canada : JMIR perioperative medicine , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 160153

 BACKGROUND: Precise functional capacity assessment is a critical component for preoperative risk stratification. Brief submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (smCPET) has shown diagnostic utility in various cardiopulmonary conditions. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine if smCPET could be implemented in a high-volume presurgical evaluation clinic and, when compared to structured functional capacity surveys, if smCPET could better discriminate low functional capacity (≤4.6 metabolic equivalents [METs]). METHODS: After institutional approval, 43 participants presenting for noncardiac surgery who met the following inclusion criteria were enrolled: aged 60 years and older, a Revised Cardiac Risk Index of ≤2, and self-reported METs of ≥4.6 (self-endorsed ability to climb 2 flights of stairs). Subjective METs assessments, Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) surveys, and a 6-minute smCPET trial were conducted. The primary end points were (1) operational efficiency, based on the time of the experimental session being ≤20 minutes
  (2) modified Borg survey of perceived exertion, with a score of ≤7 indicating no more than moderate exertion
  (3) high participant satisfaction with smCPET task execution, represented as a score of ≥8 (out of 10)
  and (4) high participant satisfaction with smCPET scheduling, represented as a score of ≥8 (out of 10). Student's t test was used to determine the significance of the secondary end points. Correlation between comparable structured surveys and smCPET measurements was assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. A Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess agreement between the methods. RESULTS: The mean session time was 16.9 (SD 6.8) minutes. The mean posttest modified Borg survey score was 5.35 (SD 1.8). The median patient satisfaction (on a scale of 1=worst to 10=best) was 10 (IQR 10-10) for scheduling and 10 (IQR 9-10) for task execution. Subjective METs were higher when compared to smCPET equivalents (extrapolated peak METs
  mean 7.6, SD 2.0 vs mean 6.7, SD 1.8
  t CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of smCPET in a presurgical evaluation clinic is both patient centered and clinically feasible. Brief smCPET measures, supportive of published reports regarding low sensitivity of provider-driven or structured survey measures for low functional capacity, were lower than those from structured surveys. Future studies will analyze the prediction of perioperative complications and cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05743673
  https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05743673.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH