The Moral Burden of Ambiguity Aversion

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Brian Jabarian

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại: 205.68 Religious ethics [formerly 291.5]

Thông tin xuất bản: 2020

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: Metadata

ID: 164242

Comment: The original document was prepared for the PEA Soup Discussion held on May, 15 2019 :http://peasoup.us/2019/05/ppa-discussion-thomas-rowe-and-alex-voorhoeves-egalitarianism-under-severe-uncertainty-with-critical-precis-by-brian-jabarian/In their article, "Egalitarianism under Severe Uncertainty", Philosophy and Public Affairs, 46:3, 2018, Thomas Rowe and Alex Voorhoeve develop an original moral decision theory for cases under uncertainty, called "pluralist egalitarianism under uncertainty". In this paper, I firstly sketch their views and arguments. I then elaborate on their moral decision theory by discussing how it applies to choice scenarios in health ethics. Finally, I suggest a new two-stage Ellsberg thought experiment challenging the core of the principle of their theory. In such an experiment pluralist egalitarianism seems to suggest the wrong, morally and rationally speaking, course of action -- no matter whether I consider my thought experiment in a simultaneous or a sequential setting.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH