Radiographic and Clinical Comparisons of a Modern Symmetrical versus Asymmetrical Implant Design in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Lucas A Anderson, Michael J Archibeck, Brenna E Blackburn, Claire R Kapron, Christopher E Pelt, Joshua P Rainey

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại: 809.888 Modern Greeks and Cypriots

Thông tin xuất bản: United States : The Journal of arthroplasty , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 165906

 INTRODUCTION: While asymmetrical, left/right specific, femoral, and tibial components are commonly used in modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the recent introduction of a modern symmetrical, left/right nonspecific, design may afford benefits as a result of reduced implant and instrumentation requirements. Given the symmetrical trochlear design of left/right non-specific femoral components, some concerns over patient outcomes and patellar tracking may exist. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes in a symmetrical TKA design to a more commonly used asymmetrical femoral component. METHODS: There were 225 patients (246 knees) who underwent TKA at an academic center with an implant featuring a symmetrical tibial and femoral component, which features a double 9° Q-angle trochlear design instead of left/right specific trochleae, and were compared to a matched historical cohort of 235 patients (236 knees) who had asymmetrical femoral components. All surgeries in both groups were performed using a similar posterior referenced, measured resection technique. Patient demographics, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), complications, knee range of motion (ROM), and radiographic analysis performed by an independent observer, including patellar tilt and displacement, were assessed. Chi-square and t-tests were used. There were no significant demographic differences between groups. RESULTS: There were no differences in PROs, failures, or complications at one year (P >
  0.05). Radiographic patellar tracking was similar between groups with the exception of the symmetrical TKA demonstrating significantly less patellar tilt (0.5 versus 3.1°, P <
  0.0001). There was no significant difference in preoperative or postoperative ROM between the groups (P = 0.49 and P = 0.25). CONCLUSION: The symmetrical femoral design demonstrated similar PROs and outcomes to an asymmetrical design. Despite some concern that patellar tracking could be worse in a symmetrical implant, the modern symmetrical TKA design demonstrated less patellar tilt and overall appears to perform clinically similarly to an asymmetric anatomic design.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH