WEIRD-Confucian comparisons: Ongoing cultural biases in psychology's evidence base and some recommendations for improving global representation.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Igor de Almeida, Kuba Krys, Vivian L Vignoles, Arkadiusz Wasiel

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại: 636.0885 Animal husbandry

Thông tin xuất bản: United States : The American psychologist , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 173343

 The realization that most behavioral science research focuses on cultures labeled as WEIRD-Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (Arnett, 2008
  Henrich et al., 2010
  Thalmayer et al., 2021)-has given an impetus to extend the research to more diverse populations. Confucian East Asian societies have relatively strong social and technological infrastructure to advance science and thus have gained much prominence in cross-cultural studies. This has inadvertently fostered another bias: the dominance of WEIRD-Confucian comparisons and a tendency to draw conclusions about "non-WEIRD" cultures in general based on data from Confucian societies. Here, analyzing 1,466,019 scientific abstracts and, separately, coverage of 60 large-scale cross-cultural psychological projects (
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH