Long-term hemodynamic responses and reverse remodeling after pharmacotherapy in HFpEF versus HFrEF: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Adrianus J Bakermans, George L Burchell, Frances S de Man, M Louis Handoko, Soufiane Nassiri, Arno A van de Bovenkamp, Ramon B van Loon

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại: 781.729 *Pentecost and Trinity Sunday

Thông tin xuất bản: United States : American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 179022

The acute response to therapeutic afterload reduction differs between heart failure with preserved (HFpEF) versus reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), with larger left ventricular (LV) stroke work augmentation in HFrEF compared with HFpEF. This may (partially) explain the neutral effect of HFrEF-medication in HFpEF. It is unclear whether such differences in hemodynamic response persist and/or differentially trigger reverse remodeling in the case of long-term afterload reduction. A systematic search was performed, identifying 21 clinical trials investigating renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, β-blockers, and sodium-glucose cotransport 2 inhibitors that report data on afterload reduction, stroke volume, and reverse remodeling in HFpEF and/or HFrEF. In both HFpEF and HFrEF, meta-analyses revealed limited long-term change in systolic/diastolic blood pressure (-5.6/-3.2 and -4.6/-1.4 mmHg, respectively) and LV afterload reduction (arterial elastance: -0.039 and -0.055 mmHg/mL, respectively). Long-term treatment did not result in an increase in stroke volume, with the exception of β-blockers in HFrEF. Indexed LV mass decreased slightly in both HFpEF and HFrEF (-2.8 and -2.3 g/m
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH