INHALE WP3, a multicentre, open-label, pragmatic randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of rapid, ICU-based, syndromic PCR, versus standard-of-care on antibiotic stewardship and clinical outcomes in hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Julie A Barber, David Brealey, Jane Cassidy, Benny P Cherian, Antony Colles, Zaneeta Dhesi, Matthew Dryden, Virve I Enne, Vanya Gant, Juliet High, Robert Horne, Hala Kandil, David M Livermore, Daniel Martin, Justin O'Grady, Valerie Page, Robert Parker, Nehal Patel, Mark Peters, Peter Riley, Charlotte Russell, Ruan Simpson, Suveer Singh, Susan Stirling, Ann Marie Swart, Eleanor Tudtud, David Turner, Ingeborg D Welters

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại: 912.01 Philosophy and theory

Thông tin xuất bản: United States : Intensive care medicine , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 183388

 PURPOSE: INHALE investigated the impact of seeking pathogens by PCR on antibiotic stewardship and clinical outcomes in hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP and VAP). METHODS: This pragmatic multicentre, open-label RCT enrolled adults and children with suspected HAP and VAP at 14 ICUs. Patients were randomly allocated to standard of care, or rapid in-ICU syndromic PCR coupled with optional prescribing guidance. Co-primary outcomes were superiority in antibiotic stewardship at 24 h and non-inferiority in clinical cure of pneumonia 14 days post-randomisation. Secondary outcomes included mortality, ICU length of stay and evolution of clinical scores. RESULTS: 554 eligible patients were recruited from 5th July 2019 to 18th August 2021, with a COVID-enforced pause from 16th March 2020 and 9th July 2020. Data were analysed for 453 adults and 92 children (68.4% male
  31.6% female). ITT analysis showed 205/268 (76.5%) reviewable intervention patients receiving antibacterially appropriate and proportionate antibiotics at 24 h, versus 147/263 (55.9%) standard-of-care patients (estimated difference 21%
  95% CI 13-28%). However, only 152/268 (56.7%) intervention patients were deemed cured of pneumonia at 14 days, versus 171/265 (64.5%) standard-of-care patients (estimated difference - 6%, 95% CI - 15 to 2%
  predefined non-inferiority margin -13%). Secondary mortality and ΔSOFA outcomes narrowly favoured the control arm, without clear statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: In-ICU PCR for pathogens resulted in improved antibiotic stewardship. However, non-inferiority was not demonstrated for cure of pneumonia at 14 days. Further research should focus on clinical effectiveness studies to elucidate whether antibiotic stewardship gains achieved by rapid PCR can be safely and advantageously implemented.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH