Assessing the Impact of a Routine Requirement for In-Person Abortion Care for Adolescents in England and Wales: A Prepost Evaluation.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Amy Green, Kayleigh Hills, Patricia A Lohr, Jonathan Lord, Hannah McCulloch, Melissa J Palmer, Sarah Salkeld

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại: 666.123 Pressing

Thông tin xuất bản: United States : The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 214329

 PURPOSE: No-test medication abortion involves a teleconsultation, gestational age dating by last menstrual period (LMP), and home-use of medicines. In England and Wales, British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) and MSI Reproductive Choices UK (MSIUK) began offering no-test medication abortion to patients of all ages with pregnancies ≤69 days' gestation in April 2020. In May 2021, BPAS changed policy
  adolescents aged 15 years and less could initiate care via teleconsultation but must have an in-person safeguarding assessment review (screening for harm/abuse/neglect), and an ultrasound. We assessed the impact of this change on accessibility, safeguarding, and gestational age estimation. METHODS: We compared waiting time from first contact to abortion, abortions conducted at ≤6 and ≤10 weeks' gestation, and safeguarding referrals to support organizations using routine data from BPAS or MSIUK for abortion patients aged 15 years and less over 5 months before and after BPAS' policy change. For BPAS patients postpolicy change, we determined safeguarding referral source (teleconsultation/in-person) and diagnostic accuracy of LMP and other menstrual history features versus ultrasound for determining gestational age. RESULTS: Between December 1, 2020 and September 30, 2021, 614 adolescents were treated. Postpolicy change, median waiting time from the first contact to abortion at BPAS significantly increased (7 vs. 11 days, p <
  .001) and proportion of abortions provided within 1 week of contact decreased (52.7% vs. 25.9%, p <
  .01). Both were stable at MSIUK (9 vs. 9 days [p = .59]
  38.2% vs. 39.2% [p = .99]). At BPAS, all indicated safeguarding referrals were identified at initial teleconsultation. Ten of 201 BPAS patients (5.0%) became ineligible for medication abortion (gestation >
  69 days) while waiting for routine ultrasound
  both LMP and ultrasound dating suggested eligibility (gestation ≤ 69 days) at first contact. DISCUSSION: Requiring in-person adolescent consultation is associated with reduced access to medication abortion without enhancing safeguarding.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH