OBJECTIVE: Industry payments, as sources of revenue and prestige, may contribute to gender implicit bias. We examined industry payments to cardiothoracic surgeons to determine differences with respect to gender while accounting for practice focus and experience. METHODS: Payments to cardiothoracic surgeons from 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022 were abstracted from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payment database. Data were restricted to individual payments >
000 and the following payment criteria: consulting fees, compensation for services other than consulting, honoraria, education, compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a nonaccredited and noncertified continuing education program, and grant. Physician profiles were queried for gender, practice type, and year of last fellowship completion. Descriptive statistics were reported based on these factors. RESULTS: In 2014, 509 cardiothoracic surgeons (497 men and 12 women) received meaningful industry payments. Male surgeons received 0,471,192 (99.3%) with median payment of 500 and mean of 1,069, whereas women received 0,310 (0.7%) with median of 500 and mean of 859. In 2022, 674 cardiothoracic surgeons (613 men and 61 women) received industry payments, with men receiving 0,967,855 (92.4%) with a median payment of 611 and mean of 7,892 and women receiving 05,431 (7.6%) with a median payment of 000 and mean of 4,843. CONCLUSIONS: Industry payments to women increased from 2014 to 2022 as the proportion of women in practice rose. Industry support of women, with increases in compensation and roles as speakers, consultants, and educators, offers a potential strategy to combat implicit bias within cardiothoracic surgery.