Comparing ambulatory to inpatient percutaneous nephrolithotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Alan Cheng, Katie Du, Edward Matsumoto, Braden Millan, Bobby Shayegan, Michael Uy

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại:

Thông tin xuất bản: England : BJU international , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 219199

 OBJECTIVES: To investigate the differences in perioperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes between inpatient and ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with a subgroup analysis of same-day discharge (SDD) patients, summarise published ambulatory pathways and compare cost and satisfaction data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was completed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered a priori with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42023438692). Ambulatory PCNL was defined as patients who were discharged after an overnight stay (≤23 h) and SDD was considered a subgroup discharged on postoperative Day 0. RESULTS: A total of 25 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 12 comparative studies were utilised for meta-analysis. We had a pooled population of 2463 patients, of which 1956 (79%) ambulatory (747 [30%] SDD) and 507 (21%) inpatients. The ambulatory PCNL cohort had fewer overall complications (risk ratio [RR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.90
  P = 0.010)
  however, there were no differences in major complications (i.e., Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥III
  RR 0.46
  95% CI 0.17-1.21
  P = 0.12), emergency department visits (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.69-1.74
  P = 0.71), 30-day readmission (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.54-2.21
  P = 0.81) or readmission at any point (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.53-1.88
  P = 0.99). The ambulatory PCNL cohort was more likely to be stone-free defined by imaging (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.66
  P = 0.005)
  however, when stone-free was inclusive of any definition there was no difference in stone-free rates (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.98-1.23
  P = 0.10). Subgroup analysis of SDD did not result in any significant differences. Cost savings ranged from 32.37 to a mean (standard deviation) 327 (442) United States Dollars per case. No studies reported patient satisfaction data. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory PCNL seems to be a safe and efficacious model for select patients. Selection bias likely influenced ambulatory outcomes
  however, this supports overall safety of current ambulatory inclusion criteria.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH