Novel non-invasive tests for colorectal cancer screening - A cost-effectiveness analysis.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Mingjun Rui, Yingcheng Wang, Joyce Hs You

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại: 658.1552 Organization and finance

Thông tin xuất bản: United States : Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 250147

BACKGROUND: To compare cost-effectiveness of 3 novel non-invasive tests (multitarget stool RNA (mt-sRNA), multitarget stool DNA 2.0 (mt-sDNA 2.0), and cell-free DNA (cf-DNA)) with guideline-recommended tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening from payer's perspective. METHODS: Outcomes of a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 individuals aged 45-year-old with average CRC risk (no prior CRC diagnosis, adenomatous polyps, or other disorders associated with a high lifetime risk of CRC) in the US were simulated by a lifelong Markov model. Screening strategies included: Guideline-recommended strategies (colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, computed tomographic colonography, fecal immunochemical test, high-sensitivity guaiac-based fecal occult blood testing, multitarget stool DNA), 3 novel non-invasive tests, and no screening. Scenario analyses on perfect (100%) and test-specific adherence (reported real-world adherence) were conducted. Outcomes included direct cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS: All screening strategies (versus no screening) reduced CRC cases and deaths. In perfect adherence scenario, every-10-year colonoscopy was the preferred strategy (ICER=US61/QALY). In test-specific adherence scenario, every-3-year mt-sRNA was the preferred cost-effective strategy (ICER=US5,250/QALY). Testing cost, performance, adherence, and CRC prevalence, progression rate and utility were influential factors. Every-3-year mt-sRNA showed the highest probability (37.6%) to be cost-effective in test-specific adherence scenario at willingness-to-pay US00,000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: All strategies were cost-effective compared to no screening. Every-3-year mt-sRNA (preferred strategy in real-world adherence scenario) provides a cost-effective alternative when adherence to CRC screening or follow-up was not perfect in clinical practice. IMPACT: This is the first study to demonstrate cost-effectiveness of novel non-invasive tests versus all guideline-recommended CRC screening tests.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH