Một số khó khăn, vướng mắc trong việc áp dụng Điều 125 Bộ luật Hình sự năm 2015, sửa đổi, bổ sung năm 2017 và đề xuất kiến nghị=Some difficulties, obstacles in applying Article 125 of the Criminal Code in 2015 amended and supplemented in 2017 and recommendations

0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Lường Thiện Đỗ

Ngôn ngữ: vie

Ký hiệu phân loại:

Thông tin xuất bản: Nghề Luật, 2024

Mô tả vật lý: tr.49-54

Bộ sưu tập: Báo, Tạp chí

ID: 251608

Thêm vào giỏ

Pháp luật hình sự Việt Nam quy định giết người là hành vi cố ý tước đoạt tính mạng người khác trái pháp luật, xâm phạm trực tiếp vào quyền được sống của con người. Qua tổng kết lý luận và thực tiễn công tác, có trường hợp giết người nhưng bị áp dụng mức hình phạt thấp hơn đơn cử như trường hợp giết người trong trạng thái tinh thần bị kích động mạnh theo Điều 125 Bộ luật Hình sự (BLHS) (mức hình phạt tối đa 07 năm tù). Thực tiễn công tác phòng, chống tội phạm có lúc, có nơi cơ quan tiến hành tố tụng còn lúng túng trong khâu định tội, đặc biệt là trường hợp phạm tội giết người với tình tiết giảm nhẹ “phạm tội trong trường hợp bị kích động về tinh thần do hành vi trái pháp luật của nạn nhân gây ra” (điểm e khoản 1 Điều 51 BLHS) với tội giết người trong trạng thái tinh thần bị kích động mạnh Điều 125 BLHS. Bài viết dưới đây nhằm luận giải những khó khăn, vướng mắc trong việc áp dụng Điều 125 BLHS năm 2015 sửa đổi, bổ sung năm 2017 và một số kiến nghị đề xuất hoàn thiện.Vietnamese criminal law stipulates that murder is the intentional and unlawful act of taking another person’s life, directly violating the right to life. However, through theoretical and practical reviews, there are instances whe-re the punishment for murder is lower, such as in cases of murder under severe mental provocation according to Article 125 of the Penal Code (with a maximum penalty of 7 years in prison). In practice, the authorities responsible for criminal proceedings sometimes struggle with the classification of offenses, especially in cases whe-re the murder is committed under the mitigating circumstance of “committing the crime in a state of mental provocation caused by the victim’s unlawful actions” (point e, clause 1, Article 51 of the Penal Code) compared to murder under severe mental provocation as stipulated in Article 125 of the Penal Code. This paper aims to analyze the difficulties and obstacles in applying these two offenses and to propose several recommendations for improvement.

1. Đọc trực tuyến

1. Đọc trực tuyến

Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR