GE Global Research has developed, over the last 8 years, a platform of cost effective CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
capture technologies based on a non-aqueous aminosilicone solvent (GAP-1m). As demonstrated in a previous funded DOE project (DE-FE0007502), the GAP-1m solvent has increased CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
working capacity, lower volatility and corrosivity than the benchmark aqueous amine technology. The current report describes the cooperative program between GE Global Research (GE GRC), and the National Carbon Capture Center (NCCC) to design, construct, and operate a pilot-scale process using GAP-1m solvent to demonstrate its performance at 0.5 MWe. (i) Performance of the GAP-1m solvent was demonstrated in a 0.5 MWe pilot with real flue gas for over 900 hrs. of operation using two alternative desorption designs: a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR), and a Steam Stripper Column (SSC). The CSTR is a one-stage separation unit with reduced space requirements, and capital cost. The alternative is a multi-stage separation column, with improved desorption efficiency. Testing the two desorber options allowed us to identify the most cost effective, and space efficient desorber solution. (ii) CSTR Campaign: The CSTR desorber unit was designed, fabricated and integrated with the pilot solvent test unit (PSTU), replacing the PSTU Steam Stripper Column at NCCC. Solvent management and waste water special procedures were implemented to accommodate operation of the non-aqueous solvent in the PSTU. Performance of the GAP-1m solvent with the CSTR was demonstrated for over 500 hrs. while varying temperature of the desorption (230 ? 265 oF), solvent circulation rate (GAP-1m : CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
(molar) = 1.5 ? 4), and flue gas flow rates (0.2 ? 0.5 MWe). Solvent carry-over in the CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
product was minimized by maintaining water content below 5 wt.%, and desorption pressure at 7 psig. CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
capture efficiency achieved was 95% at 0.25 MWe (GAP-1m : CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
= 4 (molar), 230 oF desorption), and 65% at 0.5 MWe (GAP-1m : CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
(molar) = 1.5, 248 oF). Solvent loss was dominated by thermal degradation of the rich solvent. (iii) Steam Stripper Column Campaign: Higher expected cost of the solvent vs. aqueous amines makes solvent management a top priority to maintain the low cost for the process. During the testing of the GAP-1m solvent with the CSTR, thermal degradation of the rich solvent was found to be the main mechanism in solvent loss. Small amounts of water in the working solution were found to be an effective way to enable steam stripping, thereby lowering desorption temperature, and hence reducing thermal degradation. Steam stripping also increased working capacity by 30% due to a more efficient desorption. The concept was first tested in a glass stripping column (lab scale, GE GRC), optimized in a continuous bench scale system (2 kWe, GE GRC), and demonstrated in a 0.5 MWe PSTU at NCCC. No special system modifications were required to the PSTU to accommodate the testing of the non-aqueous GAP-1 solvent with the regenerator column. SSC was found to be more robust towards solvent entrainment (H<
sub>
2<
/sub>
O <
35 wt.%). 90 ? 95% CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
capture efficiency was achieved under stoichiometric conditions at 0.5 MWe (235 oF desorption, 2 psig and 19 wt. % H<
sub>
2<
/sub>
O). Both CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
capture efficiency and specific duty reached optimum conditions at 18 wt.% H<
sub>
2<
/sub>
O. Low amine degradation (<
0.05 wt.%/day) was recorded over 350 hrs. of operation. Controlled water addition to GAP-1m solvent decreased the desorption temperature, thermal degradation, and improved the CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
working capacity due to more efficient absorption and desorption processes. Under these conditions, the GAP-1m solvent exhibited a 25% increased working capacity, and 10% reduction in specific steam duty vs. MEA, at 10 oF lower desorption temperature. (iv) Techno-economic Analysis: The pilot-scale PSTU engineering data were used to update the capture system process models, and the techno-economic analysis was performed for a 550 MW coal fired power plant. The 1st year CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
removal cost for the aminosilicone-based carbon-capture process was evaluated at $48/ton CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
using the steam stripper column. This is a 20% reduction compared to MEA, primarily due to lower overall capital cost. CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
cost using the CSTR desorber is dominated by the economics of the solvent make-up. The steam stripper desorber is the preferred unit operation due to a more efficient desorption, and reduced solvent make-up rate. Further reduction in CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
capture cost is expected by lowering the manufacturing cost of the solvent, implementing flowsheet optimization and/or implementing the next generation aminosilicone solvent with improved stability and increased CO<
sub>
2<
/sub>
working capacity.