Centralized Purchasing Arrangements

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Beatriz Arizu

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại: 352.5 Property administration and related topics

Thông tin xuất bản: Washington, DC: World Bank, 2023

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: Tài liệu truy cập mở

ID: 316863

By examining the broad range of variations in design and implementation of energy trading models around the world, our evaluation showed that sometimes the pure Single Buyer is actually the only alternative, particularly in distressed power systems. Even under dire circumstances, it is still possible to minimize many of its drawbacks with a careful design at the outset. It is essential to procure energy competitively and build flexible contractual and institutional arrangements that envisage a smooth transition towards a more competitive power sector, when conditions permit. The results of this study also indicate that it is neither necessary nor desirable to grant a de jure monopoly status to a Single Buyer, even at the early stages of power sector reform. Such a monopoly may backfire, by creating future rigidities that will defeat the main objectives of the reform process. Experiences have shown that more often than not, Single Buyer models have resulted in unaffordable prices, lack of transparency, and virtually little or no competition in power generation.
1. ENERGY
2. ENERGY AND MINING
3. INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM
4. POWER SECTOR REFORM
5. LACK OF TRANSPARENCY
6. COMPETITION IN POWER GENERATION
7. DISTRIBUTION COMPANY
8. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
9. CONTINGENT LIABILITY
10. STATE-OWNED UTILITIES
11. POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENT
12. STATE OWNED COMPANY
13. ECONOMIES OF SCALE
14. ENERGY AND WATER
15. SOVEREIGN GUARANTEE
16. GENERATION CAPACITY
17. LACK OF CREDITWORTHINESS
18. POWER SYSTEM
19. CENTRALIZED PURCHASING
20. LEVEL OF PRIVATE
21. DEVELOPMENT OF COMPETITION
22. SMALL POWER SYSTEM
23. COMPETITIVE ENERGY MARKET
24. PARTIAL RISK GUARANTEE
25. FEDERAL ELECTRICITY COMMISSION
26. STATE ELECTRICITY COMPANY
27. UTILITY REGULATORY POLICY
28. STATE REGULATORY COMMISSION
29. INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR
30. WHOLESALE ELECTRICITY PRICE
31. STATE POWER UTILITY
32. WHOLESALE ELECTRICITY TRADE
33. CHRONIC POWER SHORTAGES
34. THERMAL POWER PLANT
35. COST OF CAPITAL
36. SANCTITY OF CONTRACT
37. RENEGOTIATION OF CONTRACT
38. POWER SECTOR REGULATION
39. TRANSMISSION SYSTEM OPERATOR
40. HIGH ENERGY PRICE
41. ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY
42. COMPETITIVE POWER SECTOR
43. ASIAN FINANCIAL CRISIS
44. PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION
45. ERRORS OF FACT
46. SMALL POWER PRODUCER
47. OIL & GAS
48. OIL AND GAS
49. MARKET PENETRATION RATE
50. NATIONAL POWER UTILITY
51. RISK OF TRANSMISSION
52. POWER SYSTEM OPERATION
53. WHOLESALE ENERGY
54. WHOLESALE MARKET
55. COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT
56. CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENT
57. LONG-TERM CONTRACT
58. PRIVATE POWER
59. CORRUPTION
60. DEMAND GROWTH
61. VARIABLE COST
62. PAY CLAUSE
63. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
64. GENERATION COST
65. REFORM EFFORT
66. GENERATION ASSET
67. SECTOR STRUCTURE
68. ENERGY CONTRACTS
69. DEMAND FORECAST
70. INCUMBENT UTILITY
71. POLITICAL PRESSURE
72. POWER CRISIS
73. POWER SUPPLY
74. POWER UTILITIES
75. TRANSMISSION COMPANY
76. LOAD FORECAST
77.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH