Điểm giao nhận hay “cống đầu kênh” trong chuyển giao quản lý tưới

Điểm giao nhận hay “cống đầu kênh” trong chuyển giao quản lý tưới - phân tích theo kinh tế tưới

0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Trung Dũng Nguyễn

Ngôn ngữ: vie

Ký hiệu phân loại:

Thông tin xuất bản: Tạp chí Khoa học Kỹ thuật Thủy lợi và Môi trường, 2020

Mô tả vật lý: tr.29

Bộ sưu tập: Metadata

ID: 330120

Thêm vào giỏ Liên kết toàn văn

Bài báo này phân tích một cách có hệ thống điểm giao nhận hay “cống đầu kênh” trong chuyển giao quản lý tưới ở các hệ thống thủy lợi dưới góc độ của kinh tế tưới và chỉ ra những khó khăn trong thực tế mà các công ty thủy nông IMC và tổ chức dùng nước cơ sở WUA phải đối mặt. Với cách làm hiện nay thì chỉ 31% IMC cho biết “cống đầu kênh” là phù hợp. Đây là một thất bại về chính sách trong quản lý tưới liên quan với hình thức miễn, thu và trả thủy lợi phí từ năm 2008 đến nay. Phương pháp được áp dụng ở đây là phân tích theo kinh tế tưới. Tiếp đến là phân tích những nguyên nhân sâu xa từ hai phía là IMC và WUA và đề ra hướng giải quyết để từ đó việc xác định “cống đầu kênh” sát thực tế hơn, công tác IMT được đẩy nhanh và thuận lợi hơn, tiết kiệm chi phí O&M. Như vậy việc quản lý hệ thống thủy lợi mới được bền vững hơn và nâng cao hiệu quả sử dụng nước tưới.This article systematically analyzes the point of management transfer or "canal head sluice" (also: sluice in canal of the 1st and 2nd level) in the Irrigation Management Transfer of irrigation systems from the perspective of irrigation economics and points out the practical difficulties that the irrigation company IMC and water user organization/association WUA have to face. With the current method, only 31% of the IMC reported that "head canal sluice" is suitable. This is viewed as a political failure in irrigation management related to the form of waiver, collection and payment of the Irrigation Service Fee (ISF) from 2008 to date. The article has analyzed the parth of ISF and pointed out its inappropriateness. Next, the causes of IMC and WUA, as well as proposed solutions, are presented so that the the identification of the "canal head sluice" is more realistic, the transfer of irrigation is accelerated and more convenient and thereby saves O&M costs. Thus, the management of the irrigation system is more sustainable and improves the efficiency of irrigation water use.

1. Đọc trực tuyến

1. Đọc trực tuyến

Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR