Quyền yêu cầu thi hành án phần bản án sơ thẩm không bị kháng cáo, kháng nghị theo thủ tục phúc thẩm

0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Nhất Linh Cao, Thanh Hoa Đặng

Ngôn ngữ: Vie

Ký hiệu phân loại:

Thông tin xuất bản: Tạp chí Luật học 2022

Mô tả vật lý: 33-41

Bộ sưu tập: Metadata

ID: 406973

Thêm vào giỏ Liên kết toàn văn

Tóm tắt
Chủ đề

Bộ luật Tố tụng dân sự năm 2015 và Luật Thi hành án dân sự năm 2008 (sửa đổi, bổ sung năm 2014) đều có quy định về "phần " bản ản sơ thẩm nếu hết thời hạn kháng cáo, kháng nghị theo thù tục phúc thấm mà không bị khảng cáo, khảng nghị thì sẽ phát sinh hiệu lực và có giá trị thi hành. Tuy nhiên, bản án sơ thấm trong đổ có phần bản án không bị kháng cáo, kháng nghị phúc thẩm của toà án cấp cho đương sự lại không được các toà án ghi nhận "Đe thi hành " mà ghi là "An chưa có hiệu lực " nên trong thực tiễn, có cơ quan thi hành án đã từ chối yêu cầu thỉ hành. Qua một tình huống thực tiễn minh họa, bài viết phân tích, luận giải về việc từ choi thi hành án trong trường hợp này cần phải được xem xét thận trọng vì có thế xâm phạm đến quyền, lợi ích hợp pháp và chính đáng của đương sự., Tóm tắt tiếng anh, The Civil Procedure Code 2015 and the Law on Enforcement of Civil Judgments 2008 (as amended and supplemented in 2014) both have provisions that the "part" of the first-instance judgment which is not appealed or protested will become valid and enforceable if the time limit to appeal, protest under appellate procedures expires. However, the first-instance judgment, including the part of the judgment not being appealed or protested against, granted to the involved parties by Courts is not recorded by the later as "For enforcement" but as "The judgment has not yet taken effect". Thus, in reality, there have been cases in which the enforcement of such judgments is refused by the civil judgment enforcement agencies. Through an illustrative practical case, this article analyzes and explains the urgent need to carefully consider the refusal to enforce the judgment in these cases as such refusal might infringe legitimate rights and interests of the litigants.

Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR