Just Prospering? Plato and the Sophistic Debate about Justice

• Ngôn ngữ: eng
• ISBN-13: 978-0197267660
• ISBN-13: 978-0198922568
• ISBN-13: 978-0198922575
• Thông tin xuất bản: Oxford Oxford University Press, 2024
• Mô tả vật lý: 1 online resource (238 p.)
• Bộ sưu tập: Tài liệu truy cập mở
• ID: 461813
• Chủ đề: 1. Justice Prospering [εὐδαιμονία] Plato The Sophists The History of Moral and Political Philosophy; 2. thema EDItEUR::1 Place qualifiers::1Q Other geographical groupings: Oceans and seas, historical, political etc::1QB Historical states, empires, territories and regions::1QBA Ancient World::1QBAG Ancient Greece; 3. thema EDItEUR::3 Time period qualifiers::3C BCE period - Protohistory; 4. thema EDItEUR::L Law::LA Jurisprudence and general issues::LAB Methods, theory and philosophy of law; 5. thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDH Philosophical traditions and schools of thought::QDHA Ancient Greek and Roman philosophy

Tóm tắt

This book argues that Plato's Republic must be understood as developing out of a 5th Century sophistic debate. In Part One the author presents a new analysis of the sophists and their extant texts addressing the important topics of justice and its value. This part shows that already in the 5th Century there was a robust debate about whether the just or unjust life was better for the self-interested individual, and that multiple sophistic authors made inventive and philosophically sophisticated arguments on both sides of this debate. The Moral Cynics argues that the intelligent individual was better off being unjust, whereas the Friends of Justice defended the idea that the just life was better for human beings. Part Two argues that Plato was very much aware of this debate and that in a number of dialogues-but most importantly in Republic-he engaged with this debate. The immoralist challenge that Glaucon and Adeimantus pose to Socrates early in Republic draws from the arguments of the 5th Century Moral Cynics and moreover identifies problems with the arguments of the 5th Century Friends of Justice. By having Socrates make an argument that overcomes the theoretical weaknesses of the earlier Friends of Justice, Plato is able to pose a new defence of justice that is more effective at responding to the Moral Cynics. The book's analysis of Republic suggests new readings for certain important passages, such as the division of goods.