Clinician Views of an Opioid Prescribing Report with Peer Comparisons and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Anish K Agarwal, M Kit Delgado, Jeffrey P Ebert, Rachel E Gonzales, E Madeline Grenader, Devon M Schroeder, Frances S Shofer, Lauren Southwick, Evan A Spencer

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại: 614.45 Patient isolation

Thông tin xuất bản: Netherlands : American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 472857

 Providing feedback to clinicians on their prescribing is a promising approach to right-sizing opioid prescriptions. The present research investigated the perceived acceptability, appropriateness, helpfulness, and areas for improvement of a monthly report providing surgical clinicians feedback on their postoperative opioid prescribing relative to guidelines, peer prescribing, and patient-reported pills taken, as well as on patient-reported ability to manage pain. Between January and May 2023, surgeons, advanced practice providers, and residents who recently received these reports as part of a health system quality improvement intervention completed a survey (n = 38) or interview (n = 8). Mean (SD) acceptability of the prescribing report was 4.2 (0.8), and appropriateness was 4.2 (0.8)
  appropriateness varied by clinical role. All features of the report were rated as "very" or "extremely" helpful by a majority of respondents. Interviewees wished for fuller explanations, real-time updates, and improved accuracy. These findings can inform the design of clinician feedback in learning health systems.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH