Etoposide + cytarabine + pegfilgrastim versus cyclophosphamide + G-CSF for stem cell mobilization in patients with poorly mobilized multiple myeloma and lymphoma.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Dong Chen, Yixuan Cheng, Xiaohong Du, Ying Fang, Shuangyue Li, Ying Lu, Renzhi Pei, Mengjie Wu, Sishi Xu, Peipei Ye, Haihui Zhuang, Xianxu Zhuang

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại: 940.531709 1918

Thông tin xuất bản: England : Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 474914

BACKGROUND: In multiple myeloma (MM) or lymphoma with poor mobilization, the combination of etoposide, cytarabine (Ara-C), and pegfilgrastim (EAP) appears to have higher mobilization efficacy than cyclophosphamide (Cy) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (CG) regimens. The purpose of this study was to examine whether there were differences in efficacy and toxicity between the two mobilization regimens. METHODS: All data were collected from Department of Hematology at the Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University from May 2016 to March 2023. And data from EAP regimen were compared with data from the CG regimen. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients were mobilized by the EAP regimen and 44 patients by the CG regimen. The target yield of 2 × 10 DISCUSSION: EAP is an excellent mobilization regimen with acceptable toxicity and could be considered in patients with MM and lymphoma with poor mobilization.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH