Evaluating the effectiveness and complications of the Retrosigmoid, Translabyrinthine and Middle Fossa approaches in vestibular Schwannoma surgical management: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 6,889 patients.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Carolina Benjamin, Emanuela Binello, Fernando De Nigris Vasconcellos, Marcos Antônio Dias Vilela, Fabricio Garcia-Torrico, Kevin Mamani-Julian, Cristian D Mendieta, Vanessa Pamela Salolin Vargas, Marcos Scalise

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại: 271.6 *Passionists and Redemptorists

Thông tin xuất bản: Germany : Neurosurgical review , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 50244

Surgical resection stands as one of the potential therapeutic methods for vestibular schwannomas (VS). However, in the management of patients with VS, there is limited literature directly comparing the Retrosigmoid approach (RSA) with the Translabyrinthine Approach (TLA) and Middle Fossa Approach (MFA). This gap arises because the MFA is typically reserved for smaller intracanalicular tumors, while the RSA and TLA are preferred for larger lesions. Our objective was to assess and compare the outcomes and safety profile of these three different surgical approaches. A comprehensive search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies comparing RSA with TLA and MFA in patients with VS. The main outcomes of interest were hearing preservation, facial nerve function, extent of resection, and postoperative complications. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager. The I
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH