Cone beam CT (CBCT) in radiotherapy: Assessment of doses using a pragmatic setup in an international setting.

• Tác giả: Abdullah Abuhaimed, Buthaina Al Ameri, Duncan Butler, Anson Ho-Yin Cheung, Mario Djukelic, Mirta Dumancic, Hein Fourie, Sebastien Gros, Marianna Koutrouli, Tomas Kron, Anja Lazovic, Runcheng Liang, Colin John Martin, Aliaksandr Miadzvetski, Lavanya Murugan, Isabelle Nilsson, Piotr Pankowski, María Cristina Plazas, Zakiya Al Rahbi, Yiannis Roussakis, Ana Cravo Sá, Daniel Eduardo Salazar Correa, Hossam Ragab Shaaban, William Small, Nada Tomic, Ngie Min Ung, Jenia Vassileva, Snezana Vostinic, Tim Wood
• Ngôn ngữ: eng
• Ký hiệu phân loại: 109.2 Collected persons treatment
• Thông tin xuất bản: Italy : Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) , 2025
• Bộ sưu tập: NCBI
• ID: 551836

Tóm tắt

INTRODUCTION: The imaging modality kV CBCT on linear accelerators (linacs) is utilised to verify positioning and anatomy in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy treatment. There is a need for optimisation of radiological protection in kV CBCT imaging protocols to avoid unnecessarily high exposures to normal tissues surrounding the target. METHODS: A network of ICRP mentees from 23 countries were surveyed for available dosimetry equipment. Standardised measurements on CBCT linac imaging systems were conducted using a cone beam dose index (CBDI) devised as a straightforward measurement for wide beam doses. Measurements were made with (a) 100 mm ionisation chambers or (b) 0.6 cc Farmer ionisation chambers and cylindrical CT PMMA phantoms, and (c) an alternative setup of Farmer chambers and cubical phantoms comprised of slabs of water equivalent material readily available in radiotherapy centres. The measurements were compared with Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. RESULTS: The survey showed limited availability for the reference setup using 100 mm chambers and CT phantoms. Correction factors were derived to convert normalised CBDI from alternative setups to the reference setup and are on average within 2% of MC simulations. CONCLUSION: The slab phantom in combination with a Farmer chamber provides an alternative to quantify CBCT radiation dose indices from linac-based image-guided radiotherapy using materials accessible in most centres worldwide. A method is presented to use correction factors for Varian Truebeam linacs if traditional 100 mm chambers and cylindrical CT phantoms are not available. This will enable most radiotherapy centres across the world to engage in meaningful imaging dose measurement and optimisation.