Titanium Elastic Nail Fixation Versus Spica Cast Application for the Treatment of Diaphyseal Femoral Fractures in Children Under Five Years Old: A Retrospective Study.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Taer Abu Jabal, Vladimir Goldman, Reem Saleem-Zedan, Naum Simanovsky, Eden Weisstub, Michael Zaidman

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại: 259.1 Pastoral care of families

Thông tin xuất bản: United States : Cureus , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 56753

 Background Femoral fractures are the most common type of injury requiring hospitalization in children. Treatment for femoral shaft fractures (FSFs) in children under six years old using closed reduction and spica cast (SC) application is a widely accepted method. In our institution, we offer the option of titanium elastic nail (TEN) fixation to parents of children under five years old. This study aimed to compare the results of SC treatment and TEN fixation in children under five years of age diagnosed with FSFs. Methodology We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all children under the age of five who had FSF treated at our institution and were managed with either an SC (28 children) or TEN fixation (26 children) between 2016 and 2022. The parents made the choice of treatment following discussions with the surgical team. In our analysis, the primary outcomes focused on radiological fracture healing and alignment, time until ambulation and limb mobilization, and complications. Additionally, we compared epidemiological data, hospitalization course, caregiver satisfaction, and follow-up duration between the two groups. Results No statistically significant differences were observed in time until fracture management or duration of anesthesia between the two groups. However, in the TEN group, short-term clinical and radiological outcomes were superior (coronal angulation: 0.92° vs. 5.9°, p = 0.0018
  sagittal angulation: 0.42° vs. 7.82°, p = 0.0005
  femoral shortening: 0.12 vs. 1.87 cm, p <
  0.0001), although the time until ambulation was longer (5.9 vs. 4.75 weeks, p <
  0.0001). Caregiver satisfaction was also higher in this group (p <
  0.005). Conversely, children treated with TEN fixation more frequently required strong analgesic prescriptions (90% vs. 42%, p = 0.01), underwent more radiographs (during surgery: 6.73 vs. 3.61, p <
  0.0001
  during follow-up- 6.42 vs. 4.3, p = 0.003), had longer-lasting follow-up (7.9 vs. 3.2 weeks, p = 0.003), had an extended hospitalization (1.8 vs. 1.2 days, p = 0.004), and needed additional procedures for TEN removal. Both methods exhibited a low complication rate. Conclusions Titanium elastic nailing can be considered a viable treatment option for FSF in children aged two to five years, offering favorable clinical and radiological outcomes, enhanced caregiver satisfaction, and a low incidence of complications.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH