Predicting dose response to prostate cancer radiotherapy: validation of a radiation signature in the randomized phase III NRG/RTOG 0126 and SAKK 09/10 trials.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: D M Aebersold, A M Berlin, R J M Correa, A Dal Pra, E Davicioni, I S Dayes, J A Efstathiou, F Y Feng, P Ghadjar, W A Hall, S Hayoz, G Hildebrandt, T Hölscher, T G Karrison, Y Liu, J M Michalski, A-C Mueller, P L Nguyen, M B Parliament, L Plasswilm, B Polat, A Pollack, J A Proudfoot, J M Robertson, H M Ryu, H M Sandler, C Schär, J P Simko, D E Spratt, G N Thalmann, P T Tran, S G Zhao, D R Zwahlen

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại: 978.02 1800–1899

Thông tin xuất bản: England : Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 575446

BACKGROUND: The SAKK 09/10 trial randomized biochemically recurrent prostate cancer patients to salvage radiation 64 Gy versus 70 Gy, and the NRG/RTOG 0126 randomized intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients to definitive radiation 70.2 Gy versus 79.2 Gy. We investigated a previously developed Post-Operative Radiation Therapy Outcomes Score (PORTOS) to identify preferential benefit from radiation dose escalation (DE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PORTOS was evaluated in patients enrolled in SAKK 09/10 and NRG/RTOG 0126 with available tissue that passed quality control (n = 226, 215). PORTOS was evaluated in the published post-operative groups in SAKK 09/10 and in tertiles in NRG/RTOG 0126 as cut-offs had not been established for biopsy samples and definitive radiation patients. Clinical and molecular correlates in a real-world dataset of 42 407 prostatectomy and 31 107 biopsy samples were also analyzed. RESULTS: In SAKK 09/10, the biomarker-treatment interaction was statistically significant between PORTOS (lower versus higher) and treatment arm for clinical progression-free survival. Only patients in the higher PORTOS group benefited from DE. In NRG/RTOG 0126, in patients with a lower tertile PORTOS, there was no difference in Phoenix biochemical failure (BF). However, for patients in the average and higher tertile PORTOS range, there was a significant benefit for DE for Phoenix BF. An interaction test indicated a significant difference in benefit for DE between higher and lower PORTOS groups. PORTOS was not strongly associated with clinicopathological variables in either trial or the large real-world dataset. In the latter, PORTOS was modestly associated with hypoxia signatures and strongly associated with immune signatures and subtypes. CONCLUSION: In the SAKK 09/10 and RTOG 0126 randomized controlled trials, we demonstrated that PORTOS can potentially identify a subset of patients who benefit from DE, a subgroup that cannot be identified using clinicopathological or prognostic variables. These results suggest that PORTOS could be used clinically as a predictor of radiation response.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH