BACKGROUND: This systematic review sought to examine the application of decision analytic models (DAMs) to evaluate cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention interventions in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), a region that has experienced an increasing CVD burden in the last two decades. METHODS: We searched seven databases and identified model-based economic evaluations of interventions targeting CVD prevention among adult populations in SSA. All articles were screened by two reviewers, data was extracted, and narrative synthesis was performed. Quality assessment was performed using the Philips checklist. RESULTS: The review included 27 articles from eight SSA countries. The majority of the studies evaluated interventions for primary CVD prevention, with primordial prevention interventions being the least evaluated. Markov models were the most commonly used modelling method. Seven studies incorporated equity dimensions in the modelling, which were assessed mainly through subgroup analysis. The mean quality score of the papers was 68.9% and most studies reported data challenges while only three studies conducted model validation. CONCLUSIONS: The review finds few studies modelling the impact of interventions targeting primordial prevention and those evaluating equitable strategies for improving access to CVD prevention. There is a need for increased transparency in model building, validation and documentation.