Comparison of peripheral cutting balloon angioplasty with conventional balloon angioplasty for recurrent hemodialysis vascular access stenosis: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

• Tác giả: Daisuke Furushima, Shingo Hamamoto, Masaaki Murakami, Kojiro Nagai, Takao Okawa, Satoshi Tanaka, Hiroshi Yamada
• Ngôn ngữ: eng
• Ký hiệu phân loại: 373.236 Lower level
• Thông tin xuất bản: United States : The journal of vascular access , 2025
• Bộ sưu tập: NCBI
• ID: 581816

Tóm tắt

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) and conventional balloon angioplasty (control group) for recurrent vascular access stenosis in arteriovenous fistulas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized single-center clinical trial included patients with hemodynamically significant recurrent vascular access stenosis of an arteriovenous fistula. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess primary patency, whereas the log-rank test was used to evaluate differences in patency between groups. Functional evaluations were performed using Doppler ultrasonography. RESULTS: Patients ( CONCLUSION: In patients with recurrent vascular access stenosis of the arteriovenous fistula CBA is effective and superior to conventional angioplasty.