INTRODUCTION: We conducted a pilot study to test the feasibility of a future randomized controlled trial comparing e-cigarettes to traditional pharmacotherapy among people who smoke daily, were motivated to quit, and failed to quit within the past 5 years using pharmacotherapy. AIMS AND METHODS: Eligible participants were assigned to either: (1) an e-cigarette (n = 20) or (2) combination nicotine replacement therapy (NRT
patches and lozenges
n = 10). Participants received 5 weeks of product and selected a quit date 1 week later. Assessments were completed weekly, and electronic diaries were completed each day. As a pilot randomized controlled trial, outcomes focus on effect sizes and not statistical significance. RESULTS: Participants in the e-cigarette and NRT groups had a mean age of 51 (SD = 13) and 50 (SD = 10) years old, were 55% and 60% female, and were 15% and 0% nonWhite, respectively. At least 90% of participants completed each weekly assessment and 77% of participants completed at least 80% of daily diaries. Mean cigarettes smoked per day reduced from 18 (SD = 6.2) to 2.4 (SD = 4.4) per day in the e-cigarette group and 16.5 (SD = 8.5) to 4.9 (SD = 5.9) per day in the NRT group. Rates of biochemically confirmed 7-day point-prevalence abstinence at the end of treatment were numerically, but not statistically, higher in the e-cigarette group than the NRT group (35% vs. 10%, OR = 4.8, 95% CI = 0.5 to 46.5). CONCLUSIONS: Among current daily cigarette smokers who have previously tried to quit and failed with standard pharmacotherapies, the provision of an e-cigarette is a feasible intervention. A larger adequately powered trial is warranted. IMPLICATIONS: This pilot study suggests that e-cigarettes may serve as an acceptable harm reduction intervention for people who smoke but cannot quit smoking with traditional pharmacotherapy, however, adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed.