Deciphering RCC immunotherapy outcomes: insights from a Japanese multi-institutional study on the CANLPH score's impact.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Takahiro Adachi, Motoo Araki, Haruhito Azuma, Kazutoshi Fujita, Wataru Fukuokaya, Tatsuo Fukushima, Takeshi Hashimoto, Yosuke Hirasawa, Teruo Inamoto, Kengo Iwatsuki, Satoshi Katayama, Tatsushi Kawada, Takahiro Kimura, Kazumasa Komura, Ryoichi Maenosono, Tomohisa Matsunaga, Keiichiro Mori, Keita Nakamori, Ko Nakamura, Kazuki Nishimura, Kyosuke Nishio, Yoshio Ohno, Moritoshi Sakamoto, Masanobu Saruta, Ryoichi Shiroki, Kiyoshi Takahara, Tomoaki Takai, Shingo Toyoda, Takuya Tsujino, Taizo Uchimoto, Fumihiko Urabe, Takafumi Yanagisawa, Atsuhiko Yoshizawa

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại:

Thông tin xuất bản: Germany : World journal of urology , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 676744

 PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine the utility of the CANLPH score as a predictive biomarker for patients with advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (a/mRCC). By validating its prognostic value, this study aims to contribute to more personalized treatment strategies for a/mRCC. METHODS: In a multicenter retrospective study by the JK-FOOT consortium, we analyzed data from 309 a/mRCC patients undergoing ICI-based therapy. The CANLPH score-a composite marker of C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet to hemoglobin ratio (PHR)-for its prognostic accuracy in predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS). Advanced statistical methods, including receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, Cox proportional-hazard regression, and Harrell's concordance index (C-index), were employed to assess its predictive capacity against established factors. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 17 months, revealing two-year and five-year overall survival rates of 76.8% and 62.4%, respectively, with CSS rates at 78.3% and 66.2%. The CANLPH score well stratified survival outcomes of ICI-based treatment for RCC patients (HR 5.71
  P <
  0.0001). C-index analysis demonstrated that the CANLPH score had the highest predictive potency for CSS among models, including IMDC score. Multivariate analysis confirmed the CANLPH score (HR, 5.59
  P = 0.0007) and Karnofsky performance status (HR, 2.59
  P = 0.0032) as independent prognostic factors for CSS. CONCLUSIONS: The CANLPH score emerges as a critical tool in the a/mRCC therapeutic landscape, enabling precise prediction of patient outcomes with ICI-based therapies. Limitations include the retrospective design and the single national cohort. Prospective validation studies are warranted.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH