Prospective evaluation of PI-RADSv2.1 using multiparametric and biparametric MRI for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer based on MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Yasuhisa Fujii, Kenichi Fukui, Subaru Higuchi, Ryota Ichikawa, Masaaki Kawanishi, Yusuke Kawasaki, Koichiro Kimura, Masaki Kobayashi, Ukihide Tateishi, Junichi Tsuchiya, Naohiro Yamaya, Soichiro Yoshida

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại: 171.8 Systems based on altruism

Thông tin xuất bản: Japan : Japanese journal of radiology , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 677663

 PURPOSE: To evaluate the cancer detection rates for each category of Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADSv2.1) using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and biparametric MRI (bpMRI) based on MRI/ultrasound (US)-fusion biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included participants who underwent mpMRI or bpMRI with a PI-RADSv2.1 interpretation and subsequently received MRI/US-fusion biopsy between August 2022 and December 2023. The lesion-based detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in each PI-RADSv2.1 category and the correlation between PI-RADSv2.1 categories and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade groups were analyzed. The diagnostic performance of PI-RADSv2.1 in predicting csPCa was evaluated, and diagnostic performance of mpMRI and bpMRI was compared using cut-offs, with PI-RADSv2.1 categories ≥ 3 or ≥ 4 defined as positive. RESULTS: A total of 247 lesions from 216 participants were included in this study. A total of 157 patients underwent mpMRI and the remaining 59 underwent bpMRI. The csPCa detection rates for each PI-RADSv2.1 category of mpMRI and bpMRI were as follows: category 1, 0% (0/11)
  2, 13% (3/23)
  3, 16% (5/31)
  4, 60% (43/72)
  5, 65% (26/40), in mpMRI
  category 1, 0% (0/4)
  2, 33% (1/3)
  3, 25% (3/12)
  4, 61% (19/31)
  5, 75% (15/20) in bpMRI. PI-RADSv2.1 categories were significantly positively associated with csPCa detection rates in both mpMRI and bpMRI (p <
  0.0001 and p = 0.00048, respectively). PI-RADSv2.1 categories correlated with ISUP grade groups for mpMRI and bpMRI (p <
  0.0001 for both). There were no significant differences in the detection rates between mpMRI and bpMRI for PI-RADS v2.1 positive and negative lesions. CONCLUSION: PI-RADSv2.1 using mpMRI and bpMRI could stratify the risk of csPCa, and the csPCa detection rate of bpMRI was compatible with that of mpMRI using cut-offs of PI-RADSv2.1 categories ≥ 3 or ≥ 4.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH