INTRODUCTION: Scientific publications have shown sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors to have several beneficial effects in patients with complex type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, sodium-glucose co-transporter-1 (SGLT-1) inhibitor is still under investigation in clinical trials. Recently, a dual inhibitor of sodium-glucose co-transporter (SGLT1/2), sotagliflozin, has been approved for use in patients with T2DM. In this analysis, we aimed to systematically compare the cardiovascular outcomes in patients with complex T2DM who were treated with the newly approved dual (SGLT 1 and 2) inhibitor sotagliflozin. METHODS: Electronic databases, including Embase, MEDLINE, http://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov , Web of Science, Google Scholar, the Cochrane database, and reference lists of relevant publications, were searched for publications comparing the novel SGLT1/2 inhibitor versus placebo for the treatment of patients with complex T2DM. The primary endpoint, including total number of deaths from cardiovascular causes, hospitalization for heart failure, and urgent visits for heart failure, death from cardiovascular causes, cardiac mortality, hospitalization for heart failure, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and total number of cardiac events, were considered as the endpoints in this analysis. The RevMan software version 5.4 was used to carry out the statistical analysis. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to represent the data following analysis. RESULTS: A total of 13,054 participants enrolled between 2017 and 2020 were included in this analysis, with 6734 participants assigned to sotagliflozin and 6320 assigned to placebo. The results of this analysis showed that the primary endpoint was significantly in favor of sotagliflozin with (RR: 0.73, 95% CI 0.67-0.80
P = 0.00001). Hospitalization for heart failure (RR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.60-0.75
P = 0.00001) and the total number of cardiac events (RR: 0.73, 95% CI 0.67-0.79
P = 0.00001) were also significantly lower with sotagliflozin when compared to placebo in these patients with complex T2DM. However, the risk for cardiovascular mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction were not significantly different with (RR: 0.91, 95% CI 0.76-1.09
P = 0.31) and (RR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.27-3.12
P = 0.89), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular outcomes, including the total number of adverse cardiac events and hospitalization for heart failure, were significantly reduced with the newly approved SGLT1/2 inhibitor sotagliflozin apparently showing its cardiovascular efficacy in patients with complex T2DM. Future trials with larger sample sizes and a longer follow-up time could possibly confirm this hypothesis.