Total aortic arch replacement versus proximal aortic repair for acute type a aortic dissection: A single-center 30-year experience.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Bardia Arabkhani, Jerry Braun, Delano J de Oliveira Marreiros, Rolf H H Groenwold, Jesper Hjortnaes, Niels Keekstra, Robert J M Klautz, Joost R van der Vorst, Jan van Schaik, Jos L Verhoef

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại: 296.71 Religious experience

Thông tin xuất bản: Netherlands : JTCVS open , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 683739

 OBJECTIVE: Optimal surgical management of the aortic arch for acute type A aortic dissection remains contentious. We assessed clinical outcomes after total arch replacement and proximal aortic repair (ascending aortic ± hemiarch replacement) for acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS: All patients surgically treated for acute type A aortic dissection at our institution between 1992 and 2021 were included. Study end points included all-cause mortality, distal aortic reintervention, stroke, and malperfusion syndrome. RESULTS: A total of 357 patients underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection
  76 (21.3%) received total arch replacement, and 281 (78.7%) received proximal aortic repair. The frequency of total arch replacement increased over time ( CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital mortality after acute type A aortic dissection decreased over time despite the implementation of an aggressive approach to the dissected aortic arch. Long-term survival appears favorable after total arch replacement, but remains contingent on early postoperative survival. The surgical approach should be based on the patient's clinical presentation, while considering total arch replacement in patients at risk of aortic arch reinterventions.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH