The risk of pocket infection or bloodstream infection following central venous port placement for the patients with Cetuximab therapy.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Shun-Ichi Chitose, Mioko Fukahori, Takashi Kurita, Takeharu Ono, Shintaro Sueyoshi, Hirohito Umeno

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại:

Thông tin xuất bản: England : Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 687894

ObjectiveCetuximab is a molecular targeted drug that targets epithelial growth factor receptors. The skin toxicity of cetuximab arising from epithelial growth factor inhibition is well known. Some patients with cetuximab therapy decided to make central venous port during the long-term intravenous treatments. Therefore, the author hypothesized that cetuximab administration might increase the risk of central venous port-related infection due to damage to skin barrier function. The main aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between cetuximab administration and central venous port-related infection.MethodsA total of 83 patients had a central venous port placed from 2016 through 2021. We analyzed, retrospectively, the relationship between cetuximab therapy and the incidence of central venous port-related infection involving central line-associated bloodstream infection and pocket infection. Additionally, the risk factors of central venous port-related infection were examined in the population undergoing cetuximab therapy.ResultsIn total populations (83 cases), central line-associated bloodstream infection happened in five patients (6%) and pocket infection happened in six patients (7%) after central venous port placement. In the cetuximab therapy group (45 cases), there were four patients with central line-associated bloodstream infection (9%) and six with pocket infection (13%). The pocket infection happened more frequently in the cetuximab group than the other group with significant differences. Additionally, in the cetuximab group, the patients who had an interval of less than seven days between central venous port placement and cetuximab dosing, or central venous port placement preceded by cetuximab dosing had more pocket infection with significant differences.ConclusionSkin complications after the central venous port placement were related to cetuximab administration and the timing of cetuximab therapy.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH