Is the "sling effect" of the conjoint tendon in Latarjet procedures real? A systematic review and descriptive synthesis of controlled laboratory and comparative clinical studies.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Victoria E Bindi, Timothy R Buchanan, Jonathon J Dang, Kevin W Farmer, Kevin A Hao, Keegan M Hones, Joseph J King, Justin Leal, Xinning Li, Ryan P Roach, Bradley S Schoch, Arman Tabarestani

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại:

Thông tin xuất bản: United States : Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 689418

 BACKGROUND: The Latarjet procedure is considered the gold standard for treating patients with anterior shoulder instability in the presence of critical glenoid bone loss. Proponents of the Latarjet contend that its efficacy is in-part attributable to the "sling effect" of the conjoint tendon
  however, recent studies have demonstrated similar restoration of anterior stability in patients undergoing free bone block (FBB) procedures. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the biomechanical and clinical evidence for the sling effect. METHODS: A systematic review was performed per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane were queried separately for (1) controlled laboratory studies comparing the restoration of anterior stability with and without an intact, tensioned conjoint tendon and (2) comparative clinical studies comparing patient outcomes after Latarjet vs. an FBB procedure. A descriptive synthesis of the controlled laboratory studies and a quantitative meta-analysis of comparative clinical studies were performed. RESULTS: Six controlled laboratory studies and 4 comparative clinical studies were included. Four of the laboratory studies supported the presence of a sling effect, whereas 2 studies concluded there was no added effect
  however, their data trended in favor of improved anterior stability with the sling effect. Meta-analysis of the 4 comparative clinical studies demonstrated no difference between Latarjet and FBB for any range of motion measure, outcome score, or the odds of recurrent instability (odds ratio: 0.83, 95% confidence interval: 0.20-3.52), which is concordant with the findings of each individual study. CONCLUSION: While both Latarjet and FBB procedures are efficacious in restoring stability, our critical review of the literature suggests that the reduction in anterior translation attributed to the "sling effect" in biomechanical cadaveric studies is not clinically relevant when sufficient anterior glenoid bone has been restored.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH