Since their discovery, human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have been instrumental in biomedical research, particularly in the fields of disease modelling, drug screening and regenerative therapies. Their use has significantly increased over recent years driven by the ability of hiPSCs to provide differentiated cell models without requiring embryonic stem cells. Furthermore, the transition from integrating to non-integrating reprogramming methodologies has contributed to the increase in utilisation. This shift minimises the risk of genomic alterations, enhancing the safety and reliability of hiPSCs. However, the factors that contribute to reprogramming success are still not well understood. In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis of the most prevalent non-integrating reprogramming methods across a range of starting source materials to assess their impact on reprogramming success rates. We found that while source material does not significantly impact success rates, the Sendai virus reprogramming method yields significantly higher success rates relative to the episomal reprogramming method. Our findings offer important insights from a biobanking perspective, for which long-term reliability, integrity and reproducibility of hiPSCs are crucial.