Evaluating Perinatal Health in Europe: A Comparison of Routine Population Birth Data Sources.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Lisa Broeders, Serena Donati, Zeljka Drausnik, Mika Gissler, Günther Heller, Jeannette Klimont, Alison Macfarlane, Ashna Mohangoo, Marianne Philibert, Tonia A Rihs, Luule Sakkeus, Vlad Tica, Petr Velebil, Jennifer Zeitlin, Oscar Zurriaga

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại:

Thông tin xuất bản: England : Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 696994

 BACKGROUND: International comparisons of population birth data provide essential benchmarks for evaluating perinatal health policies. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe routine national data sources in Europe by their ability to provide core perinatal health indicators. METHODS: The Euro-Peristat Network collected routine national data on a recommended set of core indicators from 2015 to 2021 using a federated protocol based on a common data model with 16 data items. Data providers completed an online questionnaire to describe the sources used in each country. We classified countries by the number of data items they provided (all 16, 15-14, <
  14). RESULTS: A total of 29 out of the 31 countries that provided data responded to the survey. Routine data sources included birth certificates (15 countries), electronic medical records (EMR) from delivery hospitalisations (16 countries), direct entry by health providers (9 countries), EMR from other care providers (7 countries) and Hospital Discharge Summaries (7 countries). Completeness of population coverage was at least 98%, with 17 countries reporting 100%. These databases most often included mothers giving birth in the national territory, regardless of nationality or place of residence (24 countries), whereas others register births to residents only. In 20 countries, routine sources were linked, including linkage between birth and death certificates (16 countries). Countries providing all 16 items (N = 8) were more likely to use EMRs from delivery hospitalisations (100%) compared to 50% and 11% in countries with 15-14 items (N = 12) and <
  14 items (N = 9), respectively. Linkage was also more common in these countries (100%) versus 75% and 56%, respectively. Other data source characteristics did not differ by the ability to provide data on core perinatal indicators. CONCLUSIONS: There are wide differences between countries in the data sources used to construct perinatal health indicators in Europe. Countries using EMR linking to other sources had the best data availability.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH