Comparing the efficacy and safety of bridging therapy vs. monotherapy in patients with minor stroke: a meta-analysis.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Yousef Alanazi, Saud Aldanyowi, Abdulsalam Aleid, Awn Alessa, Mostafa Alhodibi, Abdulmajeed Aljabr, Sami Almalki, Abbas Almutair, Mohammed Alsuwaylih

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại:

Thông tin xuất bản: Romania : Journal of medicine and life , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 698275

The two main therapeutic approaches for stroke treatment are endovascular thrombectomy, which involves mechanically removing the thrombus, and bridging therapy, which uses intravenous thrombolytics (IVT) prior to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). This study aimed to compare monotherapy (EVT or IVT alone) with bridging therapy (IVT+EVT) in terms of efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with minor ischemic stroke. After a thorough screening, eight studies were included for qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis, comprising a total of 3,117 patients across the treatment arms. The main outcomes of interest were the efficacy of treatment modality, the rate of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and mortality. In terms of functional outcomes measured by the Modified Rankin Score (mRs) 0-1, no significant difference was observed when comparing IVT monotherapy with bridging therapy (IVT+EVT), with an odds ratio of 0.79 (
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH