OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical efficiency of using the sentinel lymph node (SLN) imaging agent METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 23 patients with OSCC who underwent RESULTS: The SDRs of lymphoscintigraphy and SLNB were 91.3% (21/23) and 100.0% (23/23), respectively. The SDRs of lymphoscintigraphy for patients in pathological stages I/II and III/IVa were 100.0% (15/15) and 75.0% (6/8), respectively. Among the 2 patients with negative imaging results, both were stage IVa and both had SLN metastasis. The SLNs were located in levels Ib, IIa, IIb, III, and IV, accounting for 45.0% (18/40), 40.0% (16/40), 10.0% (4/40), 2.5% (1/40), and 2.5% (1/40), respectively. The median follow-up duration was 32.0 months (range: 13.0-68.0 months). During follow-up, none of the 23 patients (100.0%) showed lymph node (LN) metastasis. As a result, the sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were all 100.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The application of