Impact of differential glycemic management goals in pre-anhepatic and anhepatic phase on early grafted liver function after liver transplantation: An open-label, randomized, controlled study.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Lei Cui, Yi Duan, Zhifeng Gao, Fulei Gu, Zuozhi Li, Huan Zhang

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại:

Thông tin xuất bản: United States : Journal of clinical anesthesia , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 718330

 BACKGROUND: Liver graft function is related to the quality of liver transplantation (LT). High-quality perioperative glycemic management is considered hepatoprotective. However, no studies have explored the effects of specialized and staged blood glucose management target ranges on reducing glycemic variability (GV) and early allograft dysfunction (EAD) after LT. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, a total of 188 LT recipients were randomly assigned 1:1 to the less intensive glucose management (LIGM) group and the more intensive glucose management (MIGM) group. They followed goals of 7.8-10.0 mmol/L and 4.5-6.7 mmol/L in the pre-anhepatic and anhepatic phases, respectively, and the goals of 4.1-10.0 mmol/L in the neohepatic phase and postoperatively. The primary outcome was EAD, and the secondary outcomes were GV, incidence of hyperglycemia/hypoglycemia, postoperative liver enzyme levels, 30-day postoperative infection rate, one-year survival rate, and TNF-α, IL-6 and C-reactive protein levels. RESULTS: A total of 182 adult patients (89 in the LIGM group and 93 in the MIGM group) completed the study. The mean age of the recipients was 51.46 ± 10.79 years, and the median MELD score before surgery was 16. The incidence of EAD was significantly lower in the LIGM group than in the MIGM group (10.11 % vs 31.18 %, P <
  0.001), with a relative risk (RR) of 0.32 (2-sided 95 % CI 0.110-0.562). There was no statistical difference in the 30-day postoperative infection rate between the two groups (P >
  0.05). The one-year survival rate of the LIGM group was higher than that of the MIGM group (92.13 % vs 82.02 %, P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Adopting LIGM (7.8-10.0 mmol/L) during the pre-anhepatic and anhepatic phases helps to reduce the incidence of EAD after LT and promotes the recovery of liver function, but does not increase the incidence of postoperative infections.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH