BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have elevated cardiopulmonary and mortality risk, particularly following exacerbations. While single inhaler triple therapies (SITTs), such as budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF), reduce cardiopulmonary risk versus dual bronchodilator therapy, there is limited evidence comparing outcomes with SITTs versus multiple inhaler triple therapies (MITTs). METHODS: SKOPOS-MAZI was a retrospective comparative effectiveness study in patients with COPD aged ≥40 years using US administrative claims data from Optum's deidentified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database. The primary and secondary endpoints were time to all-cause mortality and time to first severe cardiopulmonary event following initiation of BGF or MITT (identification period: October 1, 2020-June 30, 2023
index date: first prescription fill). Relative hazards of outcomes were assessed until a censoring event using Cox proportional hazards models, with inverse propensity treatment weighting accounting for between-group imbalances (standardized mean difference >
0.1) in baseline characteristics. RESULTS: In the primary cohort, risk (hazard ratio [95% confidence intervals]) of all-cause mortality and a first severe cardiopulmonary event were 18% (0.82 [0.75, 0.91]) and 12% (0.88 [0.83, 0.93]) lower in patients initiating BGF versus MITT
results were consistent across censoring definitions, landmark periods, and sensitivity cohorts. CONCLUSION: In this real-world comparative effectiveness study of patients with COPD initiating BGF or MITT, BGF was associated with lower all-cause mortality and severe cardiopulmonary event risk versus MITT after accounting for between-group differences in baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. This study supports the benefits of BGF over MITT and the need to consider proactive use of SITTs in COPD management.