BACKGROUND: Treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains challenging owing to the lack of clear guidelines on surgical resection. The 2021 ICC guidelines have not fully resolved the ongoing debate between surgical and nonsurgical treatment options. This study aimed to identify trends and issues in ICC treatment strategies in the clinical field by surveying the attitudes of hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HBP) surgeons. METHODS: A survey was conducted among 235 board-certified HBP surgeons affiliated with the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. This survey explored the perspectives on tumor conditions that define resectable, borderline resectable, and unresectable diseases, focusing on tumor size, number, and vascular invasion. RESULTS: Notable variability was observed in the criteria for oncological resectability. While 42.1% of the respondents considered a maximum tumor diameter of 5 cm as resectable, 37.5% indicated no size limit for resectability. Opinions regarding the resectability of tumors with lymph node involvement and vascular invasion vary widely, highlighting the need for standardized criteria. CONCLUSION: This survey revealed diverse approaches for defining resectability in ICC, emphasizing the necessity for more precise guidelines. Further research and expert consensus are required to establish standardized criteria that can guide clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes.