OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine if oxytocin discontinuation in the active phase of labor impacts the rate of cesarean delivery (CD) compared to continuation of oxytocin. DATA SOURCES: This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. A research librarian performed a database search using a combination of standardized terms and keywords related to oxytocin discontinuation and stages of labor from database inception until February 2024. This protocol was registered in PROSPERO. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials of pregnant patients who received oxytocin for induction or augmentation of labor whose outcomes compared discontinuation and continuation of oxytocin in active labor were included. We defined "active phase of labor" as defined by each trial. Non-randomized trials, quasi-randomized trials, and animal models were excluded. The primary outcome was the rate of CD. Secondary maternal outcomes included postpartum hemorrhage, total blood loss, and infectious outcomes. Secondary neonatal outcomes included Apgar score at 5 minutes <
7, umbilical arterial pH <
7.10, neonatal therapeutic hypothermia, NICU admission, neonatal resuscitation at birth, and neonatal death. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: The risk of bias in each study was assessed using the guidelines outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Heterogeneity was measured using Higgins I RESULTS: 15 randomized controlled trials, including 5734 patients, were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. The rate of CD, reported in 13 studies, was lower with discontinuation of oxytocin in the active phase of labor (RR=0.80
95% CI, 0.66-0.97
95% prediction interval, 0.38-1.22). Discontinuation of oxytocin was also associated with a lower risk of uterine tachysystole (RR=0.45
95% CI 0.34-0.60
I CONCLUSIONS: Although associated with an extension of labor by half an hour, discontinuation of oxytocin in the active phase of labor was associated with a 20% decreased risk of CD and a lower risk of uterine tachysystole and non-reassuring fetal heart rate tracing. While the pooled analysis suggests a beneficial effect, this finding is dependent on the inclusion of studies with concerns regarding trustworthiness.