Transcranial magnetic stimulation in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cortical excitability and therapeutic efficacy.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Hong-Li Fang, Zi-Jian Feng, Yu Han, Zi-Yu Wei, Yu-Feng Zang, Hang Zhang, Na Zhao, Qian Zhuang

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại:

Thông tin xuất bản: Switzerland : Frontiers in psychiatry , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 728188

 BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) currently lacks a universally accepted biomarker or diagnostic test, underscoring the need for objective and effective assessment methods. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has emerged as a promising tool for both assessing cortical excitability and providing therapeutic interventions. This study conducted two independent meta-analyses to evaluate: 1) the potential of TMS in assessing cortical excitability, and 2) its therapeutic efficacy in managing ADHD symptoms. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials, and PubMed following PRISMA guidelines. The "cortical excitability" meta-analysis included studies comparing TMS-EMG or TMS-EEG neurophysiological measures between ADHD patients and healthy controls. The "therapeutic" meta-analysis focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating repetitive TMS (rTMS) effects on ADHD symptoms. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated for pooled effect sizes. RESULTS: In the "cortical excitability" meta-analysis, 17 studies were included, demonstrating significantly reduced short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) in ADHD compared to healthy controls (pooled SMD = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.41-0.88, P <
  0.00002). No significant differences were observed for motor evoked potentials (MEP), motor thresholds (aMT/rMT), cortical silent period (cSP), ipsilateral silent period (iSP), or intracortical facilitation (ICF). The "therapeutic" meta-analysis, encompassing 8 samples from 7 studies, demonstrated that rTMS significantly improved ADHD symptoms compared to control conditions (pooled SMD = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.19-0.70, P = 0.0006). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the potential of TMS as both a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in ADHD. Reduced SICI appears to be a key neurophysiological marker of ADHD, reflecting cortical GABAergic dysfunction. Additionally, rTMS shows promise in alleviating ADHD symptoms, though further studies are needed to confirm long-term therapeutic benefits and optimize stimulation protocols. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024507867.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH