Problem Adaptation Therapy for Older Adults with Chronic Pain and Negative Emotions in Primary Care (PATH-Pain): A Randomized Clinical Trial.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Samprit Banerjee, Charles R Henderson, Patricia Kim, Dimitris N Kiosses, Julianna Maisano, Lauren Meador, Joanna Pantelides, Emily Petti, Lisa D Ravdin, M Carrington Reid, Danielle Vaamonde, Yiyuan Wu

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại:

Thông tin xuất bản: England : The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 737428

OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of Problem Adaptation Therapy for Pain (PATH-Pain) versus Usual Care (UC) in reducing pain-related disability, pain intensity, and depression among older adults with chronic pain and negative emotions. DESIGN: RCT assessing the between-group differences during the acute (0-10 weeks) and follow-up (weeks 11-24) phase of treatment. SETTING: A geriatrics primary care site. PARTICIPANTS: 100 participants (80 % females, Mean Age = 75.5) with chronic pain, negative emotions, and varying cognition (56 % had cognitive impairment) were randomly assigned to PATH-Pain (N = 49) or UC (N = 51). INTERVENTIONS: PATH-Pain is a collaborative program which includes a psychosocial intervention designed to improve emotion regulation. UC participants received a booklet that described evidence-based self-management pain strategies. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes: Pain-related disability (Modified Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire), and pain intensity. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Depression (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale), emotion regulation (Emotion Regulation Questionnaire), and treatment satisfaction (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire). RESULTS: During acute treatment (by Week 10), PATH-Pain vs. UC participants showed a significant decrease in pain-related disability [contrast mean difference (CMD) = -1.96, P = 0.02), CI [-0.47, -3.44]] and in depression severity (CMD = -2.50, P = 0.03, CI [-.0.23, -4.76]), but not in pain intensity. PATH-Pain (vs. UC) participants also demonstrated a significant improvement in expressive suppression, an aspect of emotion regulation (CMD = 2.120, P = 0.010, CI [.085, 4.155]). During follow-up (Week 11 to 24), there were no significant between-group differences in pain-related disability, pain intensity, or depression severity. CONCLUSIONS: This primarycarebased study demonstrates the short-term efficacy of PATH-Pain versus UC in reducing pain-related disability and depression in older adults with comorbid chronic pain and negative emotions, as well as varying degrees of cognitive functioning.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH