Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Mental Health Outcomes in Frontline Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Marieke Arts-de Jong, Dirk E M Geurts, Henricus G Ruhé, Anne E M Speckens, Philip Spinhoven

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại: 133.594 Types or schools of astrology originating in or associated with a

Thông tin xuất bản: United States : Journal of general internal medicine , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 750403

 BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted the mental health of frontline healthcare workers (HCWs), but solid evidence on psychological interventions for HCWs remains limited. OBJECTIVE: Whether an adjusted therapist-assisted Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction group intervention (adjusted MBSR) is superior to a minimal self-guided mindfulness-based intervention (self-guided MBI) in improving mental health of HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: 201 frontline HCWs (47 physicians, 120 nurses, 34 supporting staff)
  enrollment between June 2020 and September 2021. INTERVENTIONS: A 4-week adjusted MBSR with eight biweekly 1.5-h sessions
  or a 4-week self-guided MBI with 24 mindfulness/compassion exercises. MEASURES: Primary outcome was the Patient Health Questionnaire - Somatic, Anxiety and Depressive Symptom Scales (PHQ-SADS) at 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included posttraumatic symptoms, insomnia, alcohol use, repetitive negative thinking, mental well-being, posttraumatic growth, mindfulness, and self-compassion at post-intervention and 3- and 6-month follow-up. KEY RESULTS: At 6-month follow-up, the adjusted MBSR was not superior to the self-guided MBI (mean difference (SE) PHQ-SADS, 0.23 (1.03), P=0.82). Both interventions showed similar within-group improvement in PHQ-SADS (Cohen's d between baseline and 6-month follow-up: adjusted MBSR -0.78 (95% CI -1.07
  -0.48), self-guided MBI -0.72 (95% CI -1.01
  -0.43)). Secondary outcomes showed that symptom trajectories differed between groups for PHQ-SADS (intervention*time F(3, 420)=3.99, P=0.008), with greater reduction at post-intervention for adjusted MBSR, and posttraumatic growth (intervention*time F(3, 350)=5.32, P=0.002), with exclusive increase post-intervention in adjusted MBSR. Both interventions showed comparable significant within-group improvements on posttraumatic symptoms, insomnia, repetitive negative thinking, mental well-being, mindfulness, and self-compassion. CONCLUSIONS: The adjusted MSBR was not superior to the self-guided MBI
  both were accompanied by significant reductions of depressive, anxiety, and somatic symptoms after 4 weeks of treatment which was sustained at 6-month follow-up. Further research is needed to investigate the possible role of MBIs to support HCWs involved in future healthcare crises. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04720404
  onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en NL73793.091.20.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH