Clinical utility and implementation of polygenic risk scores for predicting cardiovascular disease: A clinical consensus statement of the ESC Council on Cardiovascular Genomics, the ESC Cardiovascular Risk Collaboration, and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Victor Aboyans, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Perry Elliott, Michael Inouye, Juan Pablo Kaski, Maryam Kavousi, Luis R Lopes, John W McEvoy, Riyaz S Patel, Samuli Ripatti, Saskia C Sanderson, Heribert Schunkert, Panos Vardas, Vassilios S Vassiliou, Frank L J Visseren, Elisabeth Widen, Angela Wood

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại: 614 Forensic medicine; incidence of injuries, wounds, disease; public preventive medicine

Thông tin xuất bản: England : European heart journal , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 752877

Genome-wide association studies have revealed hundreds of genetic variants associated with cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Polygenic risk scores (PRS) can capture this information in a single metric and hold promise for use in CVD risk prediction. Importantly, PRS information can reflect the causally mediated risk to which the individual is exposed throughout life. Although European Society of Cardiology guidelines do not currently advocate their use in routine clinical practice, PRS are commercially available and increasingly sought by clinicians, health systems, and members of the public to inform personalized health care decision-making. This clinical consensus statement provides an overview of the scientific basis of PRS and evidence to date on their role in CVD risk prediction for the purposes of disease prevention. It provides the reader with a summary of the opportunities and challenges for implementation and identifies current gaps in supporting evidence. The document also lays out a potential roadmap by which the scientific and clinical community can navigate any future transition of PRS into routine clinical care. Finally, clinical scenarios are presented where information from PRS may hold most value and discuss organizational frameworks to enable responsible use of PRS testing while more evidence is being generated by clinical studies.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH