OBJECTIVE: To assess the currently applied regimens of antithrombotic therapy after microvascular reconstruction. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed using the MEDLINE/PubMed Database for work published until September 2022. Data synthesis and risk of bias were reported in accordance with NIH Study Quality Assessment Tools guidelines. RESULTS: 204 articles were found including the keywords either in the abstract or in the title. After screening their abstracts and titles, 41 articles were identified as suitable and the full texts were retrieved. 23 studies were included in this review. No gold standard could be shown
on the contrary, the applied antithrombotic regimens varied widely. A broad consensus could be obtained that Dextran should no longer be used after an increased complication rate was proven. The most commonly used agents are unfractionated (UFH) as well as low molecular weight (LMWH) heparin and acetylsalecylic acid (ASA), although the literature results are partly contradictory. CONCLUSIONS: A consensus could be found that it is useful to perform thromboprophylaxis when the patient is immobilized, but there is no evidence for a survival advantage of the flap by chemical prophylaxis. On the contrary, it has been shown that there is an increased rate of bleeding complications and flap loss combined with the simultaneous use of multiple chemical anticoagulants. In conclusion the generalized use of anticoagulation is explained less by microvascular grafting than by general medical risk factors. Thus, large prospective RCTs will be needed to establish a gold standard therapeutic regimen.