OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of low tendon compression rehabilitation (LTCR) versus high tendon compression rehabilitation (HTCR) for treating patients with insertional Achilles tendinopathy. METHODS: In an investigator-blinded, stratified randomised trial, 42 sport-active patients (30 males and 12 females
age 45.8±8.2 years) with chronic (>
3 months) insertional Achilles tendinopathy were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive LTCR or HTCR. Both rehabilitation protocols consisted of a progressive 4-stage tendon-loading programme, including isometric, isotonic, energy-storage and release and sport-specific exercises. The LTCR programme was designed to control Achilles tendon compression by limiting ankle dorsiflexion during exercise, eliminating calf stretching and incorporating heel lifts. The primary outcome was the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) score at 12 and 24 weeks, which measures tendon pain and function and was analysed on an intention-to-treat basis using a linear mixed model. Significance was accepted when p<
0.05. RESULTS: 20 patients were randomised to the LTCR group and 22 to the HTCR group. Improvement in VISA-A score was significantly greater for LTCR compared with HTCR after 12 weeks (LTCR=24.4
HTCR=12.2
mean between-group difference=12.9 (95% CI: 6.2 to 19.6)
p<
0.002) and after 24 weeks (LTCR=29.0
HTCR=19.3
mean between-group difference=10.4 (95% CI: 3.7 to 17.1)
p<
0.002). These differences exceeded the minimal clinically important difference of 10. CONCLUSIONS: In sport-active patients with insertional Achilles tendinopathy, LTCR was more effective than HTCR in improving tendon pain and function at 12 and 24 weeks. Consequently, LTCR should be considered in the treatment of insertional Achilles tendinopathy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05456620).