Psychometric measurement properties and reference values of the six-spot step test, the six-minute walk test, the 25-foot walk test, and the 12-item multiple sclerosis walking scale in people with multiple sclerosis.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: Finn Boesen, Ulrik Dalgas, Lars G Hvid, Anders Guldhammer Skjerbæk, Egon Stenager, Laurits Taul-Madsen

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại: 004.2 Systems analysis and design, computer architecture, performance evaluation

Thông tin xuất bản: Netherlands : Multiple sclerosis and related disorders , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 90223

 UNLABELLED: This review investigated the psychometric properties of the most commonly used short-, long-, complex- and patient-reported walking outcome measures in multiple sclerosis(MS): the timed-25-foot walk test (T25FW), the six-minute walk test (6MWT), the six-spot step-test (SSST), and the 12-item MS walking scale (MSWS-12), along with reported reference data of these tests. METHODS: Based on PubMed and Embase searches, psychometric as well as descriptive data of T25FW, 6MWT, SSST, and MSWS-12 were extracted from studies evaluating persons with MS (pwMS). Descriptive data was also extracted from healthy controls (HC), if reported. Data was displayed as median [IQR]. RESULTS: A total of n=84 studies (N=36.929 pwMS, 64% females, age 49.6 [43
 51] yrs
  N=3.093 HC, 40.0 [37.5
 47.5] yrs) were included. In pwMS, expanded disability status scale (EDSS) was 4.0 [3.0
 4.8], patient determined disease scale (PDDS) 2.6 [2.0
 3.0], time since diagnosis 11.6 [9.9
 13.2] yrs, and MS-phenotypes (RR/SP/PP/unknown) were 68/19/10/3%. PwMS performed substantially worse than HC across all walking capacity outcomes. Weak to strong associations were found for construct validity (r=0.29-0.88, EDSS or PDDS and walking capacity or ability outcomes) and concurrent validity (r=0.16-0.88 between walking capacity and ability, r=0.73-0.95 between walking capacity outcomes). Ecological validity showed weak to moderate associations between daily steps and walking outcomes (r=0.42-0.68). Good to excellent test-retest, intrarater, and interrater reliability were reported across outcomes (ICC=0.71-1.00). Responsiveness was most frequently reported as the minimal-clinically-important-difference, minimal-detectable-change, or as the minimal-important-change (data not shown). CONCLUSION: Overall the T25FW, 6MWT, SSST, and MSWS-12 demonstrate moderate to excellent psychometric properties (i.e., valid, reliable, and responsive to changes), which make them clinically useful and applicable to research.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH