Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert® Mpox and STANDARD™ M10 MPX/OPX for the detection of monkeypox virus.

 0 Người đánh giá. Xếp hạng trung bình 0

Tác giả: J Kenneth Baillie, Richard Body, Ana I Cubas-Atienzar, Jake Dunning, Thomas Edwards, Devy Emperador, Tom E Fletcher, Susan Gould, Hayley E Hardwick, Yusra Hussain, Konstantina Kontogianni, Jacob Parkes, Alessandra Romero-Ramirez, Malcolm G Semple, Anushri Somasundaran, Christopher T Williams, Dominic Wooding

Ngôn ngữ: eng

Ký hiệu phân loại:

Thông tin xuất bản: England : The Journal of infection , 2025

Mô tả vật lý:

Bộ sưu tập: NCBI

ID: 90414

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of two point-of-care (POC) molecular diagnostic tests for the detection of monkeypox virus (MPXV): Xpert® Mpox (Cepheid, Inc., USA) and STANDARD™ M10 MPX/OPX (SD Biosensor, Inc., Korea). METHODS: Diagnostic accuracy of both POC platforms was evaluated using 53 upper-respiratory swabs (URS) and 32 skin lesions swabs (SS) collected from mpox and COVID-19 patients in the UK against the Sansure (Sansure Biotech Inc.) and CDC reference qPCR tests. The analytical sensitivity of both platforms was assessed using a viral isolate from II, B.1 lineage. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity and specificity of the Xpert® Mpox was 97.67% [95% CI 87.71-99.94%] and 88.57% [95% CI 73.26-96.80%] and 97.44% [95% CI 86.52-99.94%] and 74.42% [95% CI 58.83-86.48%] comparing the Sansure and CDC qPCR, respectively and for the M10 MPX/OPX was 87.80% [95% CI 73.80-95.92%] and 76.60% [95% CI 61.97-87.70%] and 94.29% [95% CI 80.84-99.30%] and 86.67% [95% CI 73.21-94.95%] with the Sansure and CDC qPCR. CONCLUSION: The Xpert® Mpox had good diagnostic accuracy for both sample types while the M10 MPX/OPX clinical accuracy was deficient with URS. Our data supports the use of URS during the first 3 days of symptoms onset for mpox diagnosis.
Tạo bộ sưu tập với mã QR

THƯ VIỆN - TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC CÔNG NGHỆ TP.HCM

ĐT: (028) 36225755 | Email: tt.thuvien@hutech.edu.vn

Copyright @2024 THƯ VIỆN HUTECH